(12-07-2023, 04:01 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(12-07-2023, 02:04 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote: He has 8 total carries.

1 for 18
1 for 10
1 for 11
1 for 4
1 for -3
2 for 0
1 for -4

so 4 times he's been stopped for 0 or negative yardage, 1 time a short gain, 3 times a first down.

so 50% of the time it works, 50% of the time it doesn't. It's not a bad play.

Facts. It's a misdirection play predicated on overpursuit. As such it's good to run for bad blocking lines.

---

(12-07-2023, 11:35 AM)Mikey Wrote: against how many losses/short gains?

I think 3 outta the bunch would qualify as "most every time"

And he's actually better at it than Agnew.

Agreed. The recency bias is showing here bc we ran it 3 times against Cincy and two were blown up. One went for 10 but it's overshadowed by the others that didn't work. For Agnew, the issue is EVERYONE knows if he's going in motion that's the play, or a screen to him. Ridley has the threat of running an actual route in the process so it works for him.

---