(12-15-2023, 02:11 PM)Caldrac Wrote:

(12-15-2023, 02:05 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: I understand I would be giving up picks and having to pay them but I'm paying for an elite player. Not some guy who is inconsistent week in and week out.

And if I had the choice between giving up picks and money for Adams/Diggs or Ridley? The decision is very very easy.

My main option is to do neither of those but if given the choice, it's Adams or Diggs.

You're paying for an elite player on a team that has probably anywhere between four to eight elite problems to solve on both sides of the football right now at the minimum. Adams has been pretty damn good the last two years. On a 12 - 19 football club. . .

Last night was his first 100+ yard game since week three and he went seven straight weeks without a TD at one point. That's because he's currently playing on a team with elite problems. Between the coaching staff, some injuries and some lack of talent in some areas.

You can't say it's been the defense as the issue there in Vegas neither. They're middle of the pack with their offense being 29th overall. 

So much for elitism there I guess.

If you think that Adams is part of the reason they're losing, then this conversation is going no where.

It couldn't possibly be because they had a horrible HC and incompetent QB play. No. It's definitely because of Adams who is on pace for about 1,300 yards and 8 TDs with Oconnnell and Jimmy G as his QB.

Try and separate elite players who can't control their QB situation.

Not to mention, if we were to do it your way, they're paying for a non elite player when they have 4-8 elite problems. Brilliant.

---