(12-18-2023, 12:48 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(12-16-2023, 07:53 PM)p_rushing Wrote: Per law, they have to keep the images, just like they have to keep the ballots. They have no clue where these ballots came from or how they were counted since images don't exist.

The second issue you brought up has already been admitted in court that they didn't perform a hand recount of the ballots per the law. You should stay current on what actually happened instead of relying on the media to tell you.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

(12-17-2023, 04:48 PM)p_rushing Wrote: Here are 2 links, you can ignore the commentary if you want but the screenshots show the law wasn't followed. They are still arguing in court or ignoring the material impact on the election though.

https://www.emerald.tv/p/georgia-secreta...tes-office
https://www.emerald.tv/p/georgias-secret...te-cancels

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

The screenshot shows an email from the GA SoS saying that the ballot counting was reviewed and the only mistakes found were of a typical nature and did not affect the election outcome. 

That's your smoking gun?

That is their opinion that they didn't affect the election. It is the citizen's opinion that they did. There has been no actual hand count done following the laws. We don't actually know the counts from Fulton, ballots appeared, were removed, images gone, duplicates, etc.

There are around 170,000 ballots that they refuse to allow to be reviewed. There are 17,000 ballots in this last round of news. This is 1 county in the state. The entire system is designed to allow fraud.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---

(12-18-2023, 01:31 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Not enough. And of course we don't even know how many were for each candidate.

You seem to be missing the point. It doesn't matter what the counts were, fraud is fraud. The entire system has to be fixed or no one's vote matters.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---