The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Who would you select here?
|
Quote:If Watkins is say a 7.1 and Teddy is a 7.0 It would be foolish to pick Watkins. If a QB is graded high enough to be a franchise type guy you take him even if there are other dominant talents at other positions. This is assuming of course the grades are similar. If Teddy is only a 5.5 then obviously pick Watkins instead. Pretty much spot on. Some people find this hard to understand. Actually some people take it even one step further and claim to know the player's relative grades (lol). I know I don't, and I won't pretend like I do. If Teddy is perceived as a franchise QB, he will be the pick at #3, simple as that. Now I don't think he will be perceived as the franchise QB, but that's beside the point.
<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.