Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Which situation is worse for a team? Taking a bad QB or having a middle of the road QB?

#58

Quote:This is a good question and one that I don't think we have enough info about Khan to know. 

 

I will say that I am quite scared by the comments coming from all 3 of Dave/Gus/Shad. It certainly seems like they are willing to settle for a mid round QB purgatory ceiling. I am praying that it's a smokescreen...because while I think that Dave can build a contending roster soon we are going to wind up just like the Texans/Bengals...missing our SB window because we're trying to get there with a Garoppolo/Fales/Murray/McCarron blah type QB. 
 

Can we be done with this "purgatory" bellywash?

 

http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/0ap200000...2011-class

 

<p style="margin-left:40px;">"Just average," is how one NFC personnel exec described this QB class. "The kid from Central Florida (Blake Bortles) has a chance to be really good. (Johnny) Manziel scares me -- he's 50-50. (Teddy) Bridgewater reminds me a little of Byron Leftwich, in that he's a little soft. (Derek) Carr's just good. You take one of them in the third round, you're happy with that. The problem is, if you really want one of these guys, you almost have to take them in the first."

<p style="margin-left:40px;"> 

<p style="margin-left:40px;">Several high-level evaluators said four players appear to stand out in this year's class: South Carolina defensive end Jadeveon Clowney, Buffalo outside linebacker Khalil Mack, Auburn offensive tackle Greg Robinson and Clemson receiver Sammy Watkins.

<p style="margin-left:40px;">The NFC personnel exec opined that Bortles, if given a pure grade based on his potential, would probably fall in a cluster of eight or so players behind those top four. The rest, he said, might not be any better than second-round talents.

 

At some point, can't we simply accept we aren't likely to land a franchise QB no matter how high we select one?  And that selecting one at #3 is probably not a risk worth taking when there's much better talent available at other positions of just as great if not greater need?  Instead, all indicators seem to suggest taking one in the second round or later is likely to bring you a similar caliber QB, but at the right price.

 

I don't understand why it must be repeated time and again:

 

It's certainly not franchise QB or bust in 2014 for the Jaguars.  It is not now or never.  We will find one even if it isn't this year.

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Which situation is worse for a team? Taking a bad QB or having a middle of the road QB? - by pirkster - 03-25-2014, 01:26 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!