The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Mega Mock and Potential Final 53
|
I like the mock overall but I don't agree with the reasoning for Watkins over Mack.
Our two pure LEO guys are 34 & 32, and Caldwell and Bradley have both said the moves that were made in free agency were in part made to let them choose whoever they want in the draft and not feel like they have to take certain players and positions. While I do agree that WR is more of an immediate need than LEO, I don't think Caldwell will base his decision on that at 3. I think he'll go BAP, which I think would be Watkins anyway -- but could very well be Mack. Another issue, I can't see Caldwell trading up to draft a second QB with as many holes as we have. We have 11 picks and he just said he'd like between 12-14. I think it would be plausible to trade up for a QB but not if we've already drafted one early. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.