(01-16-2024, 11:54 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(01-16-2024, 11:09 AM)snarkyguy_he_him_his Wrote: The defensive stance people take when others dare tell them that Lawrence isn't the chosen one is just staggering to me.

He has issues. He's young, but he's played 3 years of college ball and now 3 years of NFL ball. He hasn't corrected his issues.

I've said it before give him a top 10 line he will have a fantastic season.

But a generational QB would still be successful. He's just normal. Which is fine.

But stop thinking he will ever be Mahomes or Brady.. or even Aikman or Young.

EDIT: the 49ers have like the 20th ranked offensive line and they are going to the superbowl. Is Brock Purdy that much better? That's sad for Trevor

Nah

You're just pinning [BLEEP] on TL that is affected by line play and other variables;es and weakly trying to say other successful QBs still perform despite similar issues.

Trevor performed despite his issues enough to warrant the efficiency ratings I've laid out that you are completely ignoring with your unfounded conjecture. 

The SF line through the first 10 weeks this year had a win rate (pass and rush combined) of 61.4% - Jags were 55% and during that stretch we won 8 games!!  What do you think happened to those numbers in the weeks to follow??
Enlighten us. 

The PFF overall line score at that time (1o weeks) for SF was +.81 (only 16 teams were in the + side) 
The Jags score at that time was negative - 4.78 over 5 whole points lower on a scale that runs from -9 to +7 league wide! 

Your argument about SF's line is complete and utter hogwash. 

Trevor doesn't need a top ten line. He needs a functional line. 
Bring this one from ~30th up to 18th and he'll produce enough to put your straw-grasping gripes to bed. 

And for the love of all things holy, stop talking about his college tape. Gimme a [BLEEP] break. No one cares.