(02-21-2024, 09:39 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:

(02-21-2024, 08:57 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: It's going to take him experiencing problems first hand for him to change his mind. His defense will be that even though it does have some side effects, it's better than covid. He can't know or verify the truth of that, but it's what he believes.

Lol, he isn’t changing his mind. Once you are onboard with forcing people to take am experimental vaccine to sustain their livelihood, you have reached the point of no return.

(02-21-2024, 02:01 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote:

(02-21-2024, 09:32 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Geez I hate when you guys do this. Just go read the Community Notes link in the Tweet you posted. Under "Immunization, Vaccines" there's a short list of those vaccines that require a waiting period. You post stuff like this like it's some huge unknown that proves the conspiracy and yet the information you want is right there in the link. Live virus types require a wait, most Covid vaccines do not meet this requirement but you have to know for sure. https://www.redcrossblood.org/faq.html#eligibility

---

It's not hard work, you guys and your persistence in ignorance is just laughable most of the time. When Drifter throws up a bull [BLEEP] headline I'm going to drop some truth to counter the nonsense.

---

I have 3 cousins who can't vaccinate because of GBS, I'm quite aware, as you already know, of the exceedingly rare adverse reactions to vaccines. They are safe and effective no matter how much you guys bleat on about it. It's ok, I know I'll not change your minds, I just post about it here for the same reason NYC does, someone has to speak for the other side in this echo chamber.

It's hardly and echo chamber, dude. Every time we have this conversation, I ask you for the same thing and you can't provide it, because it either doesn't exist or it hasn't been released. Age-adjusted metrics are a terrible data point, which is how they justify giving this vaccine to 18-year-olds.