(02-24-2024, 10:55 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote:

(02-24-2024, 12:17 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: I didn't say I don't understand, I said I don't pretend to know more than I know.  You don't know that the data isn't considered, you just know that YOU don't know it. That's my issue, you make claims from your own lack of information. I can't solve that for you.

You're the one making the claim, dude. You literally just posted here, in this thread (among multiple others) that the vaccine makes every age group safer. Here, let me refresh your memory: 

(02-22-2024, 01:45 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: All? No, but a whole lot did, and the vaccines helped that number be less.

(02-22-2024, 09:11 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: All of them. Every one.

I've been repeatedly asking you to show me where you got that information for the last two years. You haven't. You've posted some age-adjusted metrics which are irrelevant to that claim. You can NOT state the level of vaccine efficacy across age groups because you don't KNOW it. That information has not been released. Therefore, YOU are the one making a claim from your own lack of information. Don't try to gaslight me, bro. 

It's not complicated. Just admit you can't provide anything to support your claim, then kindly shut the [BLEEP] up. I'm trying hard to respect you, bro, but it's getting harder and harder watching our healthcare break because people like you don't have either the backbone or the knowledge to hold our institutions to account. 

Does anyone else here know why that's important to draw a distinction between age-adjusted and age-specific? Or does it sound like I'm bleating on about something insignificant?