Look again. You only linked one. You referenced another that I have to search out. You need to simmer down a notch. While this is a start, I need to actually sift through the data before I can see if it supports your claims. Even then, it's still only 2 studies, looking at two different things. I accept that, though. I even like the countries where they got their data. They do a better job collecting their data from my experiences in the past.

Even still, it doesn't mean they are definitively correct, but if the methodology is sound and the data comprehensive, you at least have something to tie your opinions to rooted in fact. I won't get pedantic and point out that in the study you linked, one of the researchers received grants from Pfizer. The other authors didn't have any major conflicts of interest, so I am lest skeptical. It's probably impossible to exist in that field without being associated with Pfizer, but it's worth noticing.

---