He can't keep a topic on point anymore. I am assuming he's now saying that climate change is the reason why millions of illegals are crossing the border but he didn't convey it the way he intended.

I don't think climate change deniers are all in this camp of "It's made up" or "It's not happening". There's plenty of evidence to support it's happening. I think it's more along the lines of "Is the data being presented fairly?" or, and I see this a ton, "They said back in 1989 that Florida would be underwater by now, or Al Gore said this, etc".

For me, there's three things that I like to look at:

1. Sure, mankind has played a role in it, but, to what extent does it truly matter?

2. There's historical evidence, both, scientifically supported and supported via ancient stories on a global scale, to suggest that, we've had pole shifts, ice ages, mass flooding, heated periods of time on this planet, etc. This is WELL BEFORE the industrial age took off and began to sky rocket at the turn of the previous century.

3. How much of these recent fires, super storms and floods are all really coming from nature, who is to say it's not some Government [BLEEP] around with weapon modification or using specific DEW's to create these events? Because there's evidence out there to support this as well.

So, it's a soup of issues with one group pushing a specific narrative to appease it's corporate overlords to get their donor money and money under the table to pass policies into law, etc.

There's also a natural cycle of this happening on our planet. With or without human intervention as well. One minute it's "The planet is warming up too fast" to "Well, guess what folks? We might actually be heading towards a mini ice age".

So, which one is it?

---