(03-25-2024, 08:21 AM)Caldrac Wrote:

(03-25-2024, 07:33 AM)mikesez Wrote: Neither of those things matter either way.  Doesn't matter how many guns they had.  Egypt had two successful insurrections in the 2010s and none of the civilians had any guns at all. Doesn't matter if most of the people were just onlookers.  There were plenty of brawlers and plenty of chanters.  Ignore the onlookers and we still have a problem, right?

Is there a provision in Article 2 of the constitution or in Title 3 of the US Code to allow for a delay of the proceedings?

Actually, it does matter. We're not Egypt. It also circles back to the hysteria the media and some of the folks on the left tried to generate out of this.

You would have thought it was a real Bloodbath. Much of the claims were exaggerated and it was a fart in the wind compared to other riots and protests that had occured leading up to that point.

Democracy went on.
Presidency went on.
Our lives went on.

Nothing really changed in the grand scheme of things. The fact that we're an armed nation with a Government and Law Enforcement that typically has an itchy trigger finger?

We made out good. I would like to see the roles reversed though. Just for [BLEEP] and giggles.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk