(04-02-2024, 04:28 PM)Sneakers Wrote:

(04-02-2024, 01:59 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: That info is in the twitter thread linked in the article. 

How is it relevant? 

I'll let you speculate on your own why many people may not feel great voting for a candidate who owes a loan shark ~300 million dollars.

Of course I don't expect any of this to change opinions of folks who have already bought in on voting for a raping, traitorous, con-man who tried to steal an election, but there may be some "fiscal conservatives" out there who see the red flags amongst the dollar signs in this particular debacle.

Still don't see it in the text of the article.  Is it buried in a secondary link?  Again, I trying to follow your theory of relevance.  I expect there are some on this board who have refinanced a property at some point in their lives.  What conclusions should we draw about these individuals from such loans?

Loan shark is new.  Are you suggesting the bond company is doing business illegally?