(04-03-2024, 07:33 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(04-03-2024, 06:35 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: So, you're saying that hyperbole is a great substitute for intellectual integrity. As long as it's the correct political opinion. Sounds great.

---

No, dip [BLEEP] 

I'm calling you a disingenuous prick for trying to protect the rep of a criminal because you don't want to call Hankey  a loan shark - even though he is absolutely a [BLEEP] loan shark 

Having a whole building of enforcers that begin harassing "clients" when they are one day late on their 20% loan that should be 5% - threatening to come claim their assets from them is indeed the equivalent of a loan shark in the modern parlance. 

But why should I be surprised that your mental midgetry required me to break it down like this??

[BLEEP] moron

Regarding the first part in bold of your nonsense, what part of being a sub-prime lender is against the law?  What makes him a "criminal"?

Regarding the second part in bold of your nonsense, why should someone with a low credit score's loan be 5% vs. 20%?  I happen to have an excellent score, and I know if I go to my credit union for a loan I will get a very good interest rate.  In my younger days when my credit score was not-so-good, I could still get a loan from my credit union at a much higher interest rate along with stricter terms.  Does that make my credit union a "loan shark"?  By your logic every rent-to-own business, every "buy here pay here" car lot, every "payday loan" company is a "loan shark".

Finally, if I default on a loan for say an automobile, the lender is going to send it to collections which will indeed be calling me and "harassing" me while threatening repossession.  Once again by your logic that makes just about every financial institution a '"loan shark".

---