(04-05-2024, 04:33 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote:

(04-05-2024, 02:43 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: I already explained all of this. 

You can hash out the semantics of business and lending ethics all you like. I don't need to do that to understand that making money off of others' misfortune is shady. 

The guy is called a loan shark by his peers in the finance world because his business model is indeed the modern day equivalent. It is legal. It is also unethical and slimy as [BLEEP]. 

Third time I've had to hash this out in this thread. 

I'll leave you guys to your echo chamber for a while. No one wants to hear a dissenting view around here. 

It's no shock that this bothers no one, though.
25 rape allegations, 80 some odd felony charges, 12 failed businesses, hush money to porn stars, and flatly stating he wants to turn the presidency into a monarchy hasn't dissuaded his cult. 
Why would owing a loan shark hundreds of millions of dollars change your mind?

And you question MY objectivity. LOL

You don't welcome dissenting views. Once again, you want to hold others to a standard by which you don't abide. 

You came in here swinging your dick around, making conjecture, and talking down to people who pointed out your logical fallacies. Now you're acting like some innocent little girl who wandered into a biker bar by mistake. Of course we're going to question your objectivity. This place may be mostly conservative, but it's hardly an echo chamber.

LOL

You're so easily offended. 

I posted an article and twitter thread link that outlines a candidate's imposing amount of a debt to someone the industry views as a loan shark - and you and others decided it was a nothing burger. 

If that's "swinging my dick around" you have some truly odd perceptions. 

Also - holy hell, man - it is a political discussion board on the internet. There isn't some precious protocol of pleasantry implied or required here. I have zero issues expressing myself plainly here, and don't give a flying [BLEEP] how you perceive it. Relax.

---