(04-01-2024, 10:38 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(04-01-2024, 10:14 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: The issue isn’t taking Muma. The issue is taking him at pick 70 after already paying a lot of money to Foye and then trading up for Lloyd.

Muma has yet to return anything of value for that high investment. Maybe someone gets hurt (yay! That’s what we have to hope for!) and Muma steps up. But if everyone is healthy, your top 70 pick never sees the field for 3 years.

That's what I said a few posts ago.

Drafted a backup too high.

I have also stated (like others) that they were apparently thinking long term and likely viewing Oluokun as a high-end stop gap - and Muma/Lloyd would allow them to get cheaper there after two years when Foye's deal was up. 

That didn't work out as planned because they have decided Oluokun/Lloyd are their best options and they are spending to keep it that way. 

My biggest gripe with this strategy is that they needed starters at 5 other positions yet spent that pick on a backup ILB that may become a starter in year 3 (and now is still not a starter in year 3) 

As much as that bugged me, I kinda got over it, and then they selected Miller last year and I just threw my hands in the air.