The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Mack may be as good as clowney.
|
I'm not even that high on Clowney, but if the choice is between him and Mack at 3, its not even a discussion who I'm taking.
Its just the typical "underdog" mentality that has this board all liking Mack..and will all be making excuses when he is fairly average at the next level. What's he going to lean on at the next level to make him stand out? That 4.7/ 4.8 speed?? lol Kearse was practically a 4.4. guy. Size? lol, I guess since Mathis can do it, he can, right? right? The exceptions are the rule around here. As said....if we want to take Mack further back in the 1st round, then fine....but it would be foolish to take a player like that as high as 3. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.