(04-25-2024, 11:32 PM)jagboss Wrote: https://twitter.com/MathBomb/status/1764...bMAeA&s=19

(04-25-2024, 11:37 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: Or this:

https://x.com/mathbomb/status/1783690966563529099?s=42&t=CBRi9jm88jvmDLxwjCos5Q

So which is it? The Jags seem to like that metric, even though it hasn't exactly meant anything for production.

(04-25-2024, 11:24 PM)AnOldBrownie Wrote:

(04-25-2024, 11:13 PM)p_rushing Wrote: He feasted on bad defenses. He had 1 year. Plenty of question marks on if he will be able to be a #1 WR. Fits right in with all the other Jags 1st round WR picks.

He scored a long TD against FSU but he also wasn't the focus. When he wasn't the #1 WR on the team, kept under 100 against good teams, he probably wasn't worth the pick. The Jags need a sure fire starter, he'll probably start, but a CB there would have been better.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

Nothing says either corner that was bypassed by a lot of teams would have been better than Montaric Brown this upcoming season.   CB in the 2nd round could be just as productive...or could just as likely be a bust.  (See Emmanual Forbes last draft)

This team is going to go as far as Trevor Lawrence takes it, and they just gave him a tall/fast target with skill.    

Let's not be too negative.

Not negative but not a definite #1 WR. He has speed and measurables but hasn't been the #1 WR yet. Hopefully it works out but there were other areas that the team needed to fill. The division has updated the offenses and the Jags need to update the lines and DBs. WR was needed but not at this risk. The options before the trade were all 5 year starters and sign or get comp picks.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---