(04-26-2024, 12:50 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:

(04-26-2024, 12:18 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: How so? 

He's nailing this offseason so far filling the holes everyone has been screaming for - what is your reasoning for suggesting he'd take a free safety in round 2?

I think Baalke is good in round 1 and poor in rounds 2-5.

Strange, Bisby and Ventrell recent examples.

Would you say the questionable positional value compared to other roster needs is what primarily calls those still unproven picks questionable? 

If so, would you say there's a pretty good chance a GM who is mandated to collaborate with coaches is more likely to make such a decision based on the staff's perspective of positional need? 

I dislike ALL of those picks - two of them intensely - but the full context I'm viewing this through doesn't interpret those picks as "Baalke is bad in rounds 2-5" 

I think that's a gross oversimplification.

---