(04-26-2024, 01:47 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(04-26-2024, 12:50 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: I think Baalke is good in round 1 and poor in rounds 2-5.

Strange, Bisby and Ventrell recent examples.

Would you say the questionable positional value compared to other roster needs is what primarily calls those still unproven picks questionable? 

If so, would you say there's a pretty good chance a GM who is mandated to collaborate with coaches is more likely to make such a decision based on the staff's perspective of positional need? 

I dislike ALL of those picks - two of them intensely - but the full context I'm viewing this through doesn't interpret those picks as "Baalke is bad in rounds 2-5" 

I think that's a gross oversimplification.

Taking a FS with those specific players mentioned still on the board is just like bypassing Torrence for Strange.

It’s also certainly positional value for me as well. A FS over DT and CB seems very strange if all are graded equally or at least close.

Let’s see how tonight plays out. If he continues to nail this draft, I have no problem at all typing out #BaalkeMasterclass.

I like his FA moves. I love the BTJ move and if he can nab Kool-Aid plus Bortolini tonight? He will have won me over.

---