The issue we’ve seen with Baalke over time is:
1. He’s not especially good at evaluating college talent. Pederson is not particularly good at evaluating OLine talent. The last three years show that.

2. Baalke is too inclined to roll the dice on injured players with measurables and upside as compared with their on field performance.

Couple that with the product we’ve actually seen on the field and it leaves many with little trust in the front office. I for one am willing to be convinced by what I see going forward. But I must be convinced.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---