(05-17-2024, 12:45 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote:

(05-17-2024, 07:31 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: The only player I can think of that sat out a whole year is Bell and that was the worst mistake of his career, he lost a ton and was never the same again. 6 mil for 1 year is good money for a RB.  Even if he did sit out he would still have the 1 year contract left on the Jags, the year doesn't disappear. Justin  Blackmon was on our roster for like 10 years because he didn't finish the contract, the years on the contract don't go away until you play them. 

  Etienne isn't going to sit out, I think RBs have learned sitting out doesn't nothing but cost you money in the long run and the time off from sitting out usually hurts their play as well which will cost them money on their next contract.  I can think of one RB that sat out that it actually helped them.  Sitting our is one of the dumbest things a player can do.

The goal is not to sit out or sit out for long.  The goal is to use the idea of holding out or a couple of missed game to force the hand of the FO.  The difference with Bell was he was not eligible for a 5th year option since he wasn't selected in the 1st round.  He held out the year of his 2nd consecutive franchise tag and was slated to make over $14M that year.  That's a lot to forfeit. A lot more than what Etienne would.  Etienne will have a 5th year option salary of $6.1 million and will still be facing two tags and shouldering all injury risk each year.  There's clearly scenarios where he doesn't hold out or has no leverage to do so, but as I mentioned previously, if he's again a significant part of the offense this year and poised to be next year as well AND there is no one stepping up taking on a meaningful portion of the run game responsibilities from him like Bigsby AND the team doesn't invest in RB significantly next offseason, it would be the most opportune time for him to hold out or at least threaten to under those circumstances.  

As much as the team has most of the leverage here, they also have a desire to field the most competitive team they can especially if they feel the squad is a playoff contender which we're already there on that.  If taking away one of Trevor's most explosive pieces (with no real replacement) would contribute to losses in the regular season, and it very well might under the above circumstances, it could force the hand of the FO to throw him a bone is all.  No one is throwing significant guarantees at an age 29 RB which is what Etienne would enter free agency as after the 5th year option and two tags, if applied.  His "payday" as it stands is going to be the two tag years if he survives them and if he survives even getting to them by getting through 2024 and 2025 relatively unscathed.  If I'm him or his agent, these things are going through my mind and if I see a point where there's increased leverage for me to use, I'm using it if I'm him is all.

Conversely, if Bigsby doesn't show up this year while Etienne continues to do so, this situation might be the impetus for either signing significant help at RB or spending another relatively high (maybe 3rd or 4th round) pick on on RB next offseason which may nix any thoughts of him using the nuclear option.  I do think Bigsby will show up this year though so probably not a perfect storm for Etienne next offseason.  Still, I'd be highly motivated to produce this season and I'd be looking for a way to start negotiations next offseason to avoid the tags if I were him.