(06-07-2024, 09:05 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(06-07-2024, 08:52 AM)Caldrac Wrote: What's there to interpret there, bub? Since you're so knowledgeable and know what she's saying. Decode it then. To me, it's pretty blatant what she's saying. 

"MAGA Nightmare", "re-educating", "sounds like a re-education camp", "I'm sure we can find another way to phrase it". I mean, are you dense, bub?

This is the equivalent of me lying or dumbing down to my four year old son when I want him to be a good boy and eat his vegetables. 

"You're eating broccoli and carrots for dinner tonight"
"No, I want potatoes and chicken nuggets"
"Okay, you can have potatoes and chicken nuggets"
*Proceeds to warm up broccoli based tater tots and vegetable based "dinosaur" nuggets*

It's the same [BLEEP] thing man. Take your blinders off. Or are you too far gone not to see everything for what it is? Don't be that guy. You're too smart for that...

Nah

She used a poor choice of words and immediately back-pedaled it. 

She's clearly talking about the need for new lawmakers and their constituents to understand the legal process - which is valid given all of the misinterpretations of recent legal proceedings coming from elected officials -  but you are way more interested in buying the spin on her comments than looking for the intent. 

Have fun with that.

Riiiiiight. So when a lefty says something, it's back pedaling, don't take it literal, don't read the tea leaves, etc. 

But, when a righty says something we're supposed to get all uptight and decipher what they said like it's the DaVinci Code. Yeah, ok, have fun with that, with your blinders on. 

How many times did you lap up the media taking Trump's words out of context? Bet you were the first one to drum up fear amongst your camp with the "bloodbath" comment he made in reference to China attempting to flood the manufacturing market through Mexico to further [BLEEP] us over in that industry. 

---