The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Liberal Tears keep flowing: Supreme Court Rules for Presidental Immunity
|
(07-02-2024, 12:28 PM)mikesez Wrote:(07-02-2024, 10:37 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: Great question. I think that would be prosecutable. What is this, Harvard Law School? I don't know that the prosecution is not allowed to bring up the pardon as a piece of evidence. Just because he can't be prosecuted for an official act, that doesn't mean the official act can't be introduced as part of the evidence at the trial. Unless you know different... |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.