(07-14-2024, 05:37 PM)Caldrac Wrote:

(07-14-2024, 04:14 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: I'm not saying you're wrong, but it sounds like you think the 20 year old kid was involved in a rather large conspiracy?  I would think they would use a more hardened and trained sniper if that were the case.  The facts as they come out will be interesting, no doubt.

I think it goes back towards a lot of things. The intelligence agencies, the fear of him winning again, the setback's he can cause the establishment. The MIC. Trump is a disruptive force.

This is how I would view it. With all the wikileaks, the Snowden and Asange revelations over the past two decades. The survelliance. The door knocking going on at people's houses for speaking out on social media, etc.

There's a good chance these events are known well enough in advance to predict the eventual outcome or to intercept it and change the course of said outcome.

I am not going to hire a professional to take this shot. It's 2024, not 1964. Oswald was a patsy that had Rubenstein as his fall guy. The CIA is learning from their mistakes by creating plausible denaibility.

They probably knew this kid was radicalized. Knew of his intentions. Had intel. And sat on it deliberately. No different than when the attack on Pearl Harbor was known in advance and we allowed it to happen. No different than when the attack on 9/11 was known in advance and we allowed it to happen.

No different than the Gulf of Tonkin lie to get us into Vietnam. Just like the WOMD line and lie that was fed to us when I was a kid to get us into Iraq again post 9/11 so Jr. could finish his Daddy's war for him.



Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk