Events like this are weird. Everyone needs an explanation to justify their world view. I have a tendency to lean towards government corruption.

In this particular case, it's hard to believe the SS didn't think to cover that LOS. It's hard to believe the cops didn't cover the only entry way to the roof of that building. It's hard to believe the shooter found the only roof with a ladder, no guards, no SS, and a perfect LOS on pure chance. It's hard to believe that there was a known threat at the event and that it went on as planned. It's hard to believe the snipers who saw him didn't fire. It's hard to believe that the police who saw the shooter with a weapon couldn't get that through proper coms quickly enough.

There's a lot that's hard to believe. However, a man in a suit with glasses, staying crouched down as he asks participants to move from behind Trump is not a stretch. I would have been doing the same thing if I was behind Trump and asked to keep the area clear. EVERYTHING isn't a stretch. I think it does more damage to look for ANY evidence of foul play than to look for ONLY the evidence of foul play.

---

I would like to know if that assistant FBI thing is true or not, though.

---