(07-22-2024, 12:56 AM)p_rushing Wrote:

(07-21-2024, 11:59 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Bro, it won't be challenged legally because it's correct. They, the conspiracy theorists who dont understand the Constitution,  already tried that tack with both Obama and McCain and were soundly rebuffed. If you're born here you're a citizens and eligible for the Presidency, end of story both legally and practically.

There's not a conspiracy. Read the Natural Law, I think that's what it is called, for the definition at the time and in article 2.  Then the 14th amendment says citizen, it does not say Natural born citizen. There is 1 case that the ruling said someone born here was a natural citizen, there is another that says different. The 1st case was ruled incorrectly as the definition is clear. If the definition was to be changed from the original definition, it would have to be in an amendment.

Since there is no law or amendment from Congress, the Supreme Court would be left to decide the case per the original definition at the time. Now who knows what they decide but it would be up to them to decide it.

Obama was legal, if you believe the fake birth certificate (for whatever reason) and SS#.
Harris is or isn't depending on which definition is taken.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

See? There you go with that conspiracy [BLEEP] again. I don't like Barack Obama at all, but his mother is a citizen of the USA and therefore he is as well. Unless you believe that his mother was not in fact his mother then you are intentionally misrepresenting the man and our laws. English Common Law is repute with cases where any person born withing the "Ligeance" of the king is considered natural born, so yeah, the pre-USA precedence supports that as well. And quite frankly, it's a really bad look for certain elements to pull this crap out of the dust bin when the candidate just so happen to be black.

---