Aside from the very specific criticism of our news media running with headlines that are sensationalized instead of good reporting, why can't you see how this works? It happens over and over. An official or document suggests a specific type of information, then it gets blitz reported across the US for a few days, then it's quietly retracted and the story sticks. JD couch [BLEEP]. Donald Trump shrapnel and pee tape. Ron Paul crazy. I could go on and on, but this is just a standard tactic. You are unable to see this as a tactic because you naively believe that everything happens in front of you is organic. It's not.

---

Christopher Wray suggests it could be shrapnel. For no reason, mind you (t wasn't part of the question to be answered). Then he says, "I think we know whether it was shrapnel or a bullet, I just don't have that in front of me right now." Why doesn't your brain ask the obvious question, which is why the [BLEEP] is he even bringing it up, then? How about you give us the details when you have them in front of you? It's not rocket science.

After he says that, EVERY news agency then takes its particular brand of sensationalism and bends it to their audiences' secret wishes and runs with it for 3 days. For conservatives, it's how dare he say that, and for liberals are like, he wasn't even shot? You guys are dumb for even entertaining this as anything other than smoke and mirrors. It's annoying.

---