The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
The Hot Takes thread
|
08-25-2024, 09:41 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-25-2024, 09:41 AM by The Real Marty. Edited 1 time in total.)
(08-25-2024, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:(08-25-2024, 09:26 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: It is diversity, but it's selective diversity. People are a lot more diverse than just on skin color. It's a convenient standard of diversity that allows the division of people into simple groups based on skin color. People are diverse on an individual basis. That's why categorizing people into groups based on sex or skin color is pointless and destructive. It pits one artificial group against another, and I agree that very often it's done for the purpose of controlling people. |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.