(08-25-2024, 09:37 PM)copycat Wrote:

(08-25-2024, 11:40 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: I think you mean unrealized gains.  It's a crazy, unworkable idea.  How much gain does a person have in a painting he bought 40 years ago?  Or in a unique business?  I have seen a business appraised at one value, only to sell for 10 times that value a couple of years later.  The only way to get an accurate valuation on anything is to put it on the market and sell it.  That's why we tax realized gains, not unrealized gains.  Because a transaction is easily measured, but without a transaction taking place, an asset valuation is just a guess.  

And then, if we tax unrealized gains, how will we treat unrealized losses?  Would the government hand out refunds?  

And how many court cases would there be when the owner of the asset disputes the valuation the government wants to put on that asset?  If I own a Picasso, and the government says it has gained in value, from 9 million dollars last year to 10 million dollars this year, I might go to court to dispute it.  We'd be starting up a whole new industry of lawyers, accountants, and appraisers who exist just to dispute the unrealized gains claimed by the government, and the tax they want to assess.  

If we put a wealth tax on wealthy people, based on unrealized gains in their assets, how many wealthy people will just leave the country?  That happened in France before they repealed their wealth tax.

Interesting that you understand this and still believe Trump is the enemy.

There’s a segment of libertarians and conservatives that are never going to back Trump. It doesn’t make them any less conservative or libertarian, Trump is hard to support. I’m literally only supporting Trump because Harris is so radical I have no choice. I don’t think Trump is that much better but at this point my focus is just avoid the cliff we are barraling towards.

---