Quote:Lol not saying they were, but I can't go into a section of this board without it being discussed so I decided to ask the question myself to see why everyone thinks the way they do.

 

I would imagine taking a QB has dominated the discussion because:

 

1)  It is the position of biggest need;

2)  It is the most important position in football-and also the most polarizing;

3)  There are guys in this draft that have been perceived throughout most of this offseason as potential franchise QBs;

4)  There are other guys later on that may be able to develop into a good QB; and

5)  The team is actually in position to draft one or more of them, possibly one in the top 3.

 

My perspective has always been if you don't like the particular discussion on a message board, you can introduce any relevant topic you wish.  Nobody is a necessarily a topical prisoner here.

 

I don't think that anyone who is discussing taking a QB is advocating ignoring the rest of the roster.  Even if the team takes a QB at 3, the team will be in position to address other positions of need later in what is considered by most observers to be a very deep draft.

---