(09-10-2024, 10:56 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(09-10-2024, 05:36 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: No, we had the lead after the fumble and even after the Hill TD.  It's clear you don't know how to read charts.   You had an issue reading the chart that was posted yesterday as well.

---

Yup

The chart yesterday was some rando Tweet of some vaguely named stat about "neutral passing" that you likely never heard of either.

As for this chart, as I showed earlier, the early down runs after the fumble worked fine (except the last drive when the "drive starter" failed), once again this team couldn't run for the 1 yard conversion, and had Lawrence thrown the ball on 3rd or 4th an 1 you two would be losing your [BLEEP] over the play call then too. Never mind that he threw a perfect pass on 3rd and 5 that Kirk dropped. And you two looking at this chart and see the 49rs and Jags in the same place on it should really give you some pause about what they were doing in the second half. The game plan took them to the 2 yard line for a 3 score lead with 4 minutes left in the 3rd. The only thing that went wrong was that ETN didn't score. Had he done so there's no Hill 80 yarder and it's likely that their defense deflates and the Jags walk out with a win. Frankly if we're in that situation 10 times 9 of them end up a Jags win, and if I had to bet $10k on the Jags to win starting over from that ETN carry I'd do it every time. [BLEEP] happens, it's how the ball bounces sometimes and the Jags [BLEEP] the bed this time around.

The 49ers beat the Jets 32-19, had a 26-7 lead in the middle of the third quarter, and they scored 16pts in the 2nd half.  There's nothing wrong with burning clock by running.  

The issue is that the Jags didn't adjust once their lead dwindled to 3 points. Their next offensive drive Pederson made an insane call to go for it on fourth deep in their own territory - running it (unsuccessfully) 4 times in a row.  The criticism is that they didn't let Trevor Lawrence take the game over on that drive.

---