(09-11-2024, 06:48 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(09-11-2024, 06:41 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: I didn’t watch the debate and in no way am I excusing Trump’s performance, but the Democrat’s own PR machine, the MSM, took part themselves in exposing Harris’s own deficiencies over the last 3 and a half years. 

To me, your argument is simply justification of why you’re voting for her.

You may be right, but it's also justification for my very low opinion of Trump.  Believe me, if the Republicans had nominated almost anyone else, I would not be voting for her.   I think the debate exposed him for what he is, which is- not mentally qualified to be President of the United States, which, by the way, dozens of former high-ranking Trump staffers agree with, including many former cabinet members.  

Like I said before, I agree with her on some issues, and I agree with him on some issues, so I have to base my vote on whom I think has the temperament, the brainpower, and the personality to function effectively as President.  And it's not him.  Kamala Harris pushed his buttons and played him like a fiddle, right there on stage, when he should have been prepared, so if you still think Kamala Harris is an empty suit, what do you think other people who are not an empty suit will do with him?

I won’t disagree about Trump, however, I will ask if you could provide an example of when he was goaded into making an irrational decision during his term. I’m not denying it happened, but an example to backup your assertion would be nice.

On the other side, Harris is an empty vessel. She may have sounded prepared last night because that’s exactly what she was; groomed and coached. On her feet she’s not smart. If she wins the election, she will be a willing figurehead for others to manipulate. Of this I have no doubt.

---