The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
DEBATE -- Trump v Harris
|
(09-13-2024, 10:28 AM)WingerDinger Wrote:(09-13-2024, 10:22 AM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: Real talk. There is nothing that killing a baby in the late third trimester for the health of the mother that delivering the baby won’t also fix. The mom will have to deliver the baby either way cuz they don’t just disappear in utero, so birth is happening one way or the other. Killing the baby doesn’t change that. Now its different in the middle of labor if it becomes between the life of the mother and the life of the baby situation, but that is an emergency and not an abortion.
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
|
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.