(09-17-2024, 05:43 PM)carp8dm Wrote:

(09-17-2024, 03:21 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: The fact that you can't correlate that pressure percentage citation with an answer to "why not throw more?" is somewhat impressive in its daftness.

(09-17-2024, 05:33 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: What the hell are you on about? 

I'm just posting multiple stats that show why our QB has not been more productive for two weeks. 
His line isn't protecting him and his receivers are dropping balls at a high rate. 

I'm not recommending more or less passing - just wish that the blockers would make their blocks and the catchers make their catches. 

Very simple stuff here.

Sorry, I just think sometimes the things you've posted are not causal.  But that's just my opinion.

At one point you say that there's too much pressure.  So if there's too much pressure we can't throw the ball as much as I suggest.

Then you say there are too many drops.  So if there are too many drops we should not throw it?  Which is counter inductive considering that if the drops were to come down, throwing the ball more would be a good idea.

I don't know, to me it seems that we should just continue to give the ball to Trevor and let him fling it.  The drops will come down as the receivers begin to realize they are gonna get more balls.  But that's just my opinion.  Pressure is pressure.  Every QB has pressure.  But if we become more dynamic and not throw on obvious throw plays, maybe the pressure % would come down.

Again, just my opinion.  I'm not going to call you names, like you did to me.  I'm just giving my opinion.   By the way, correlation does not imply causation.