(09-17-2024, 09:39 PM)Jag149 Wrote:

(09-17-2024, 09:15 PM)Caldrac Wrote: Here we go again. How is it [BLEEP] stupid to suggest a better concept, formation or play call there that could have altered the outcome of that play?

If you can cry about the lack of execution from the players then the same can be said about the [BLEEP] play caller putting said [BLEEP] players in a highly unfavorable play call.

The only thing [BLEEP] stupid here is your dog [BLEEP] attitude and dog [BLEEP] take and defense of a bad call that had a very predictable outcome based on how the day had unfolded in pass protection prior to that play.

Lighten the [BLEEP] up. He has a valid point. If I am playing defense there and I can see the QB 5 yards deep in his own endzone in shotgun? And I have MYLES [BLEEP] GARRETT lined up next to me? My job and assignment just got a whole hell of a lot easier there.

Just like when that whole Darnold to Jefferson play was referenced in this thread to use as justification to call out execution. They weren't even the same formations, concepts nor situations.

It was in the 1st half, under center with a play action element baked into the play. What did that concept allow smart [BLEEP] that our situation and concept didn't?

The element of guess work. QB's back is turned briefly. RB could get it. He's selling it to him either way. None of that happens in shotgun. I can already see your stupid [BLEEP] hands in front of me so there is no element of surprise or ability to freeze anybody to make a play develop a .5 second or two longer.

Get off your [BLEEP] high horse. God forbid a mod take a [BLEEP] L around here.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

Wow, think this is a record for [BLEEP]'s.  Actually, the way we were run blocking it doesn't surprise me.  If it had hit he would have been a genius since it didn't it gave us something to talk about. I would maybe have added a short crosser. As it was despite the 2 point safety we still had a chance to win the game.  (best silver lining I could come up with guys/gals)

I am tired of the holier than thou mentality from both camps on here. It's old and stale. Both arguments can be made, however, on that play? Leading up to that exact moment? We simply didn't do enough from top, down.

The call, like you said, could have had better elements to it. The execution could have been better. But, again, surely, if us armchair GM's and armchair HC's can see that our pass protection had been dog [BLEEP] 3x prior to that drive?

Surely, the actual HC and his staff and GM from his pressbox can see it. So, why tempt fate there that early? Knowing you got an All Pro DE, a quality defensive coordinator there in Jim Schwartz and a line that has more shakiness to it than Shakira's hips?

I try to be fair. I do. But. You have to look at each situation, look at how the game unfolded, look at how the protection did or didn't hold up. You have to know your personnel. You have to know when and where to take those risks.

That wasn't the time. And if the execution could have been better in that circumstance? So could have been the play call.

No creativity there. No element of surprise. No element of play action. No attempt to run Lawrence away from that pocket. Just an amateur hour call that you would expect to see from maybe the 50 yard line at best after you chained a few plays together and greased the gears a little bit.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---

(09-17-2024, 09:47 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Pederson saw the same thing I did:

https://twitter.com/JustonLewis_/status/...3859366082

(of course - half of our fanbase wants him fired, so, that doesn't do anything to support my opinion about the play call, LOL)

Breaking news! Offensive guru likes his calls and puts the blame on everybody else but his play design and concept.

Shocking.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---