The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trevor Lawrence: Franchise QB (TL Discussion, Merged Threads)
|
09-25-2024, 10:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-25-2024, 10:41 AM by cland. Edited 1 time in total.)
(09-24-2024, 06:34 PM)Predator Wrote:(09-24-2024, 10:40 AM)ClemsonOrangeJaguar Wrote: Interesting perspective given statistically he's one of the best deep ball throwers in the NFL and statistically one of the best at getting the ball out fast. He's got the least amount of time to throw because the OL is not good. It's not the only factor but it's obviously the biggest and all objective data leads to that. I can't imagine being a football fan and not being able to easily conclude that this OL is trash and the biggest deficiency on offense. Football has and always will start with blocking. <<insult to your mother>> It's pretty obvious you're not watching games and desperately relying on actual stats. Time to throw is clearly a wasted stat and appears to suggest that there's more to the problem than the OL. Sometimes the game calls for throwing into double-coverage, missing your wide open check-down, spinning into a sack just for fun, and chunking the ball out of bounds on third and fourth down. I mean if the defense blitzes there's no reason not to wait for a long developing route to take shape, short passes are for losers. Let me guess, next your going to tell us that completing %52.8 of passes and putting up 186 yards/game isn't worth $275 million dollars. What a <<something about feminine products>>!!!
NYC4jags Wrote:
Can we leave the personal insults behind for a while and get back to some semblance of topic, gents? Please, and thank you. |
Users browsing this thread: |
8 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.