Quote:I disputed your argument that he will never be a ball hawk. I'm not saying he will, but I sure a hell know that you DON'T know either.


You compared his college stats to those of alltime great ball hawk (LOL) Rashean Mathis' college stats.


I then countered by presenting current and future HOFers college numbers with Gratz, to which the compare with favorably.


Embarrassing, Tiny Dancer. Sooooooo Embarrassing.


Just put your tail between your legs and scurry home. Things aren't getting any better for you here.

 

Gratz was never a ball hawk in college. The only facts you can illustrate this on a text forum is with his statistical production. i.e. facts. 

 

Gratz wasn't even the best CB on his own team. I have a good idea what Gratz career will evole to just as anyone else who combine the player he was in college with what we've seen. He'll be a decent ham & egger. He'll never, thats right NEVER be a ball hawk type of CB. 

 

I cited Rashean first because he was a familiar player that people would remember as a point of reference. He also happened to be a great ball hawk in his prime. He was this in college as well. STILL holds the NCAA record for INT in a season with 14. You can laugh and pretend that in his prime Rashean wasn't one of the best in terms of being a ball hawk, all you wish. 

 

Including HOF level CB into this argument is stupid. Rashean was never as good a cover CB as those and Lord know Gratz will never be them or anything remotely close either. 

 

You are the one that did the typical bait and switch with the argument because sticking to the principals you had no leg to stand on. The Jags have zero ball hawks in the secondary and will need at least one before this defense ascends to the next level. Thats my original point and I was totally correct in that and you can't stand it. 

---