(09-29-2024, 11:44 PM)OG-JAGFAN Wrote:

(09-29-2024, 10:22 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: Bahahaha. 

You truly are one dumb poster

Says the blind Trevor Homer with no common sense and no vision.

Garrard may have been captain checkdown but hew as consistent. He actually completed balls and never had a solid WR corps outside of Jimmy Smith for a very short time at the end of his career.

Bortles never had a true number one receiver. Bortles had a career passer rating of 80 vs Lawrence current 84 and dropping real fast. Lawrence did not have the arm Lawrence had but he got those ducks where they needed to go.  Bortles had to suffer through Dave Caldwell's horrible reign of drafting and building a staff as well.  If you put Bortles in his prime on this team I would bet it all that we would be a much better team.  Bortles by no means was a good NFL QB but IMO better than we have seen from Lawrence.

Just listen to the talking heads tomorrow dawg out lawrence again and it will keep getting louder. Signing that contract may have been the biggest mistake in franchise history. That is saying a ton considering our past.

lol. Garrard was consistent? You clearly were not around those days. That was Garrard biggest problem; he would tease you one week then have a terrible performance the

Bortles is not a better QB. You say put him in his prime? Bortles best season , 2017, was outperformed by Trevor in 2022 so no, he’s not better than what we’ve seen from Lawrence. He never had a true “prime”. Trevor hasn’t even come close to the some of the ineptitude Bortles produced (exhibit A: the foot interception, or the throw into the back of his teammates helmet. Butt fumble level). Also Bortles had a true number 1 receiver in A Rob in 2015 and 2016 so that’s also false.

You saying TL is worse than them really just shows how dumb you are when it comes to football. Guarantee if you sat 32 GMs down and asked them to pick from one of those three to draft in their “prime”, the answer is Trevor, every time.

---