(10-02-2024, 01:57 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(10-02-2024, 11:26 AM)Caldrac Wrote: https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/184...eyklg&s=19

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---

I vote based on taxes, savings, security, education, infrastructure, military and geopolitical policies.

Unless she has a big rack and a phat booty. Then I lose all sense and vote that way.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

It is irrational to assume that you can predict how changing the guy or girl in charge will impact your savings and security.  Sure, a tax rate may go up, but that may cause other parts of the economy to heat up.

It is and it isn't. On the flipside, if my saving's and security have seemingly gone down under one particular party that's in charge, including having the next Presidential candidate currently in said party's current administration? 

I can deduce that more than likely my said saving's and security are that much further [BLEEP]. So, in this case? Kakalaka, bad. Orange man, good. The only thing heating up for most people is their energy bills and their temperament for incompetence. 

Hopefully 2028 springs forward refreshing candidates from both parties and viable, long term solutions. Have had enough of this muck to wade through over the past eight years. The general population needs to dig it's head out of the sand fast though so they can avoid getting their [BLEEP] hammered before the end of this decade. 

I don't see how anybody with a straight face can look me dead in the eyes and tell me they're going to vote for Harris. [BLEEP] insane to me. Just absolutely insane. You really trust this administration to resolve Israel-Palestine? Ukraine-Russia? I don't. We're [BLEEP] Geopolitically and [BLEEP] Domestically. 

A bunch of white privileged, unbangable white women are going to vote for Kakalaka over fear porn being spewed about abortions in this country. [BLEEP] wild to think about really, but, it's true.

---