(10-07-2024, 11:35 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:

(10-07-2024, 11:24 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: Nah, CBS has received their marching orders from someone powerful on left they are more aligned with that doesn't necessarily want to see Kamala win.  Probably the Pelosi/Newsome family or perhaps the Obamas depending on if they want to run Michelle in 2028.  This is uncharacteristic for CBS or any other legacy media to go after their own guy or gal like this.  And for the record, the media should treat both candidates this way.

You thinking they want Mike to be the first black tranny president?

(10-08-2024, 10:05 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(10-08-2024, 07:56 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: Sure.  That's probably true for most candidates.  It's their pocket of mega donors vs the other guys mega donors.  I just don't think Kamala has the mega donors' allegiance more than Gavin or the Obamas do.  And mega donors aren't writing checks without certain assurances on policy positions or the ability of their guy/gal to get their specific agenda done.  And if you're a player in the Democratic party with Presidential aspirations, a Kamala win very likely means you're waiting at minimum 8 years to run and maybe longer depending on if she endorses someone else on her way out 8 years from now.  A Trump win means you're definitely running in 4 years.  The media's allegiance to the left and to specific individuals on the left is sickening though.  We deserve better.

It's preposterous that any DNC donor would rather lose the next 4 years just to get their favored candidate installed for 2028.