The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Good, bad and ugly today
|
(10-08-2024, 07:56 PM)carp8dm Wrote:(10-08-2024, 08:18 AM)HardcoreMoJagFan Wrote: Speak for yourself, learning the nuances of terminology on double and triple coverage is way more valuable reading than the 18,000 post about why press Taylor sucks. I'm not calling anyone out. Just find the nuance debate on terminology interesting. The int can be bad without saying it was triple coverage. It was in a tight window that was unnecessary to throw into. Still a bad choice but at least it was deep and not affecting field position. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.