The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
That BAP VS Need Debate
|
Quote:That's most recently and we could argue that all of those players were the BAP at those picks. What about the 6-8 years prior?Can we argue that? DeCastro and Adams have been disappointments. You could argue Alshon Jeffery was a better player than DeCastro. You could also argue Mercilus was better than DeCastro, and Dewayne Allen, TJ Graham, Russell Wilson, and Nick Foles were better players than Adams. In 2011, you could argue Andy Dalton, Colin Kaepernick, and kyle Rudolph were better than Cameron Hayward. In fact, those examples bolster the argument that the Steelers are not the pure BAP team you guys suggest. Oklahomie has argued that QBs are more valuable than any other position, and that whenever you have the chance to take one, irrespective of need, you should do so. There, even though the Steelers had Roethlisberger, you had two QBs on the board capable of leading teams to the playoffs when they took Cameron Heyward. Did the Steelers draft either of those QBs? No. They took Heyward. Heyward didn't become a starter until his 3rd year, and for his career, he has mustered 7.5 sacks. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/pl...ywCa01.htm Why would they take Heyward in bottom of the first round over two QBs who have subsequently proven able to win in the league? For that matter, why would they take DeCastro AND Adams over Russell Wilson and Nick Foles? I cna come up with one of two possible reasons: 1) They didn't need to spend a first round (or second round pick) on a QB who would ride the pines behind a still in his prime Ben Roethlisberger who has QBed the Steelers to two Super Bowl championships and three Super Bowl appearances; 2) They actually had Heyward rated as BAP on their board and allowed superior players at more important positions to go to competitors, which isn't supposed to happen according to BAP proponents. In 2010, the Steelers took Emmanuel Sanders in the draft, over guys like Eric Decker, Navorro Bowman and Daniel Graham. Can anyone honestly say Sanders is better than ANY of those guys?!? Maybe you could argue he is Decker's equal as a receiver, but there is NO WAY anyone can argue Sanders is a better player than either Bowman or Graham. So again, if the Steelers are a BAP team, and BAP precludes teams from taking inferior players and allowing superior players to go to the competetion, how does that happen? In 2009, the Steelers took DT Ziggy Hood in the first round. Superior players that came off the board after Hood include Jairus Byrd, James Laurinaitis, Max Unger and LeSean McCoy. How did that happen? Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.