(11-10-2024, 05:12 PM)JagFan81 Wrote:

(11-10-2024, 05:08 PM)enigma Wrote: We can't play the "we would have won with Trevor" either. 

Defense did its job - as it has for most of the games this year. Once again, the offense failed this team.

You know the D is ranked 32nd yeah? They have definitely played better the last few games and today was their best performance this year but they've hardly been the Sacksonville of old. They've had more than enough bad days and plays that hurt us. It's not just all the O's fault or Trevor's.

We lost by 5 today so you think we'd played the same with Trevor?

It's amazing how much a bend-but-dont-break defense finally breaks when your sputtering offense goes 3 and out on their first 6 drives of EVERY game.

We can't conclude either way. I would certainly hope we would play better with Trevor in there but we've seen 4 years of work to determine that it's sadly inconclusive how we would have played with him in there. I would say yes, we would have won but that's just me hoping for the best. 

Can't we just have Trevor DECISIVELY shut the haters, including myself where I have been very critical of his average-at-best performances, up? That's all I want. I want our franchise QB to be the reason why we WIN games consistently and not have to make excuses up for him for the past 4 years on why he wasn't the reason we lost - when in reality, he was.

---