(12-06-2024, 04:49 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(12-06-2024, 02:51 PM)copycat Wrote: Factually correct but still avoiding the actual point.  Why do I bother?

January 6 was a few orders of magnitude more serious/important than the trans identity of a member of the USPHS. Even if Rachel Levine was in a more important job like secretary of the navy, it would still be less important.  I get you might be trying to say Rachel was selected based on trans identity and would not have been selected otherwise, but, you can't prove that.  In fact you presume that anyone who doesn't look a certain way must be less qualified than someone who does look a certain way.  That ain't good, mang.  Prejudice like that is rotten.

You know 100% why Levine was chosen yet you managed to defend the selection.  Quite a few of the Biden appointments were based on race, gender and identity over qualifications.  You know this, yet like a typical liberal you duck and dodge the truth or worse accuse anyone that questions the motives of some sort of ism.  And you want to pretend you are not a self acknowledged contrarian.

---