(12-16-2024, 11:37 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(12-16-2024, 11:18 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: I know that but the coaching staff didn't. Strange was rarely ever used when Engram was in the game.

The new GM might keep him. Who knows.

I'm just saying there's a chance that Enram and Kirk are not back due to the money they save by cutting them.

If you owe the bank 100k and they say you can pay 30k this year and 70k next year you think that is saving 70k when you are still paying the money.

---

(12-16-2024, 11:25 AM)Newton Wrote: We need a new offensive scheme to take advantage of the talent we have .

Agreed, if you cut Engram it means you don't think he is worth 6.25 mil

Watching this crazy talk about saving pennies to cost us dollars and degrade a position of strength in the process.   We have 1 exceptional TE on contract through the 2025 season. (26-29 are void years) We also have one rising young TE on his rookie deal through 2026. This is what a good team does. We are suppose to do by position group. I wish they had this on the o-line...

Yes, I would like to see the 2 TE sets incorporated into the offense. The fact they have not done this is a question the management needs to answer to Shad about.

---