(12-18-2024, 10:19 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:

(12-17-2024, 08:40 AM)Mikey Wrote: I believe we save 6 if we part ways with Engram. To be fair, I'd rather eat the 6 and have him around (what is this "depth" people speak of?) than to put that hope in a rookie or guys like Deguara and Farrell. I don't want to re-up with the guy, but for that price, the juice isn't worth the squeeze.

If you designate him as a post June 1st cut, it would save 15 million.

Look. I'm not saying it's going to happen but no one knows what the new GM is going to do. And down the stretch here, Strange is going to get a ton of playing time. The year 3 jump for tight ends is legit and Strange fits the profile. He's a much better run blocker than Engram as well.

This is also a very good tight end class. You could go the Packers route and draft a couple of them. This team has many straight up holes. CB2, RG, both safeties, IDL, WR2.... Cutting Engram doesn't create a hole on this roster but instead, gives them the ability to start the young TE they drafted while filling important holes on this roster.

It might happen. It might not. My point is that you shouldn't be shocked if it does happen over the summer.