(01-19-2025, 03:04 PM)RicoTx Wrote:

(01-19-2025, 02:53 PM)BallKey Wrote: I don't agree that Goff is much better than Darnold, but I do agree that it would basically be that or 3 essentially rookie options. 

Any of those is better than being chained to Baalke. Sure that's my opinion, but I think it would also be the opinion of the vast majority of the football world.

So you're basically saying that you're going to ignore their body of work and think whatever you want to think.  Got it.

Goff has had a career being coached by the most elite offensive minds in football. Darnold has had one season in a similar situation to what Goff has spent his whole career, and he did just about as well in that one season. 

You're skipping the main point, being tied to Baalke is far worse than whatever situation the Raiders will be able to cobble together at QB next year whether that's Darnold or otherwise.

---