(04-02-2025, 03:02 PM)Jag149 Wrote:

(04-02-2025, 12:12 PM)mikesez Wrote: No, but I know a bit about the ethics of psychology.  If he actually has that information, and it's actually reliable, he violated the ethics of his profession.  

I suppose there's a third possibility, where almost 100% of his clients volunteered that information without being asked.  How did that happen? Did he recruit patients at a Democratic party fundraiser? If so, that's not a representative sample anymore, and not really worth discussing.  So why discuss it? Why make it a viral post if we think there is something unusual but ethical about his practice? We don't really think that.  We shared this information on social media because we think it is reliable and representative.  And therefore we are either being lied to, or the source is unethical.

So you have no clue, it is not what you want to hear, so in that case just call him a liar. Got it. thanks ...lol