(04-03-2025, 10:29 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(04-03-2025, 09:37 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: So you made a declaration about something you don't know as fact and then proceed to argue that everyone else is wrong about your ignorance. As usual.

He was lying, or being unethical. I don't know which of those two it was, but I know it was one of those two. It's just logic. 
Imagine you told me that there are three points out in the universe, and I said, "those three points either form a line or a triangle." Then you argued, "how can you know that? I didn't tell you where the three points are. How can you tell me that I am wrong when you are ignorant?"
That's the corner you've backed yourself into. How's the view?

(04-03-2025, 04:13 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(04-03-2025, 03:56 PM)Sneakers Wrote: Not at all true.  If you were to listen to any one of the numerous voices of reason here, you would recognize this (though probably still not admit it).  The point we're making is that YOU cannot definitively say it isn't true.  You have offered nothing more than your opinion, which tends to be somewhat less than open-minded.

You're right! That's why all along I've allowed for a second possibility, which is, it's true, but he's unethical if it's true.